iDreamPost

Was Indian 2 Just a Financial Move?

  • Published Jul 21, 2024 | 11:48 AMUpdated Jul 21, 2024 | 11:48 AM
  • Published Jul 21, 2024 | 11:48 AMUpdated Jul 21, 2024 | 11:48 AM
Was Indian 2 Just a Financial Move?

For the first time in his illustrious career, director Shankar has faced a significant setback with his latest film, Indian 2. Despite having directed several successful films in the past, Indian 2, a sequel to the blockbuster Indian (1996), has flopped at the box office. Although Shankar has seen some of his previous films struggle in certain territories, this failure is notably impactful given the high expectations surrounding the sequel. The film, which stars Kamal Haasan, has not only underperformed but has also been criticized for failing to meet the standards set by its predecessor.

A closer examination of the film’s production strategy reveals a concerning trend. The decision to extend the film’s narrative into two or three parts, instead of a single coherent story, has left Indian 2 feeling incomplete and unsatisfactory. This approach, combined with the hike in ticket prices, suggests a strategy more focused on maximizing profits rather than delivering a quality cinematic experience. Critics and audiences alike have perceived this move as an attempt to exploit the legacy of the original Indian, rather than offering a genuinely compelling continuation.

Audience reactions have been swift and harsh, reflecting a broader discontent with what is seen as a cash grab rather than a thoughtfully crafted sequel. The film’s runtime was later trimmed by 12 minutes in response to critical feedback, but this adjustment came too late to salvage its reputation. The promotional tactic of hinting at Indian 3 during Indian 2’s end credits has only underscored the perception that the filmmakers were aware of their film’s shortcomings. For a director of Shankar’s stature, this turn of events marks a notable and disappointing departure from his usually successful track record.